Yes that's right.
Example from Wikipedia. Here is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 5, in two variables:
x^5 + 2x^3y^2 + 9x^1y^4A homogeneous polynomial is one which all of the terms are of the same degree? is this true?
Well, homo means same, so yes.
Like some fashion designer guys and guy models, they're homos.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Is it true that Yahoo can say that you violated the terms and conditions if...?
one of your questions was not answered? I asked a question about music (it didn't get any answers lol) and after 4 days it was deleted and I was told I violated something. Is this right? I am a bit confused.
Thanks xxxIs it true that Yahoo can say that you violated the terms and conditions if...?
That is a conversational question not a question seeking knowledge. It really is more that chatting. Check the community guidelines. You will find this under the ';Bad'; title.
';Chatting or otherwise violating the question-and-answer format.
Yahoo! Answers is a community of questions and answers, not a chat room. If a post is neither a question nor an answer, it doesn鈥檛 belong here. If you鈥檙e looking for a place to chat with others, try Yahoo! Groups or Yahoo! Messenger Chat Rooms.';Is it true that Yahoo can say that you violated the terms and conditions if...?
You would need to give us the exact context to help. All questions that are not answered after 4 days are removed (7 days if extended). You get your points back in that case.
There are several reason questions are removed:
1. It is a violation of the rules - you will get an e-mail when that happens. If you get one, post it here in a question and the users can tell you the problem. There is no statute of limitations on breaking the YA rules.
2. There were zero answers when the time expired - no e-mail sent.
3. The BA was reported as a violation - no e-mail sent.
4. During voting, ';No Best Answer'; was chosen as the best answer - no e-mail sent.
Look in your e-mail, including the spam folder, for a violation e-mail. If not there, check your activity tab in your profile. If nothing about a violation there, then the Q was removed for one of the other reasons.
If it was something like ';where to download free music or where to download movies'; or something related to illegal-ness [lol] then someone might've reported your question and they might have deleted it as Yahoo Answers doesn't allow talk of illegal stuff as THEY can get in trouble for it too.
I don't see anything wrong with that question is it was in the polls section. It makes sense, it is a question, yahoo may of got it wrong.
i have had answers and questions deleted that has been resolved that was several months old.
that is why you see many people keep their questions and answers private
Well I asked a question called: What is your favourite number? and it got deleted too but people answered mine... Why was it deleted?
Thanks xxxIs it true that Yahoo can say that you violated the terms and conditions if...?
That is a conversational question not a question seeking knowledge. It really is more that chatting. Check the community guidelines. You will find this under the ';Bad'; title.
';Chatting or otherwise violating the question-and-answer format.
Yahoo! Answers is a community of questions and answers, not a chat room. If a post is neither a question nor an answer, it doesn鈥檛 belong here. If you鈥檙e looking for a place to chat with others, try Yahoo! Groups or Yahoo! Messenger Chat Rooms.';Is it true that Yahoo can say that you violated the terms and conditions if...?
You would need to give us the exact context to help. All questions that are not answered after 4 days are removed (7 days if extended). You get your points back in that case.
There are several reason questions are removed:
1. It is a violation of the rules - you will get an e-mail when that happens. If you get one, post it here in a question and the users can tell you the problem. There is no statute of limitations on breaking the YA rules.
2. There were zero answers when the time expired - no e-mail sent.
3. The BA was reported as a violation - no e-mail sent.
4. During voting, ';No Best Answer'; was chosen as the best answer - no e-mail sent.
Look in your e-mail, including the spam folder, for a violation e-mail. If not there, check your activity tab in your profile. If nothing about a violation there, then the Q was removed for one of the other reasons.
If it was something like ';where to download free music or where to download movies'; or something related to illegal-ness [lol] then someone might've reported your question and they might have deleted it as Yahoo Answers doesn't allow talk of illegal stuff as THEY can get in trouble for it too.
I don't see anything wrong with that question is it was in the polls section. It makes sense, it is a question, yahoo may of got it wrong.
i have had answers and questions deleted that has been resolved that was several months old.
that is why you see many people keep their questions and answers private
Well I asked a question called: What is your favourite number? and it got deleted too but people answered mine... Why was it deleted?
Is it true Jonas fans are denouncing God when they use the term OMJ?
I mean replacing God with Jonas should be considered an insult to Christians, right? Isn't it like saying Xmas instead of Christmas? What about this ';peace love jonas'; thing too? By replacing ';hope'; (which is what it really is) with their name, it is the same as saying no one in this world needs hope. These modifications to such phrases are not very pleasant. What do you think?Is it true Jonas fans are denouncing God when they use the term OMJ?
I don't think they mean to actually do that. When something new comes out that alot of people like, they come up with phrases that they think are ';cool';.
They want to express how much they adore the Jonas Brothers by replacing words in popular phrases with something related to them.
For example, people say Oh My God alot (which is a sin, to my religion anyway) so they replace the word God with Jonas.
It's dumb. Like saying you have Obsessive Jonas Disorder. Some people could be offended by that.
My little brother has a mild form of OCD.
But I don't take it to seriously. I'd rather just live my life, and not care about what fans are obsessing over.Is it true Jonas fans are denouncing God when they use the term OMJ?
Hello to Christians Oh My God is misusing gods name. As in using it as a bad way. Like for us What The Hell is bad. So I say either Oh My Gosh or What The Hey. So now with Oh My Jonas I can show I'm a Jonas fan and not say anything wrong. Peace Love Jonas is nothing. Get over it. You don't really care. Some Christians think the word Suck is bad. But I am a Christian btw.
not at all.
dont take it seriously.
you've thought about it a little to much havnt you?
christan people dont say ohmygod anyway.
cuz thats kind of defacing or something.
i say ohmygosh.
anyway...
answer mine?
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>
well the x in xmas stands for christ. or at least chi. or something.
but I think OMJ is really stupid but my mom said I shouldn't say oh my god because it devalues the name God and we're supposed to say oh my gosh instead.
I never say Oh My God, because it is misusing God's name.
I say Oh My Gosh.
So if people want to replace Gosh with Jonas, that's fine.
You shouldn't say that anyways.
no,because saying Ohhmygod is bad anyways because its saying his name in vain so actualy it better
It's showing that the Jonas Brothers are a cult. Sad generation.
that's just overly religious people with a stick up their a$$ that are complaining about that
wow youre so annoying....
dont take it seriously!
not at all you jonas haterbest myspace
I don't think they mean to actually do that. When something new comes out that alot of people like, they come up with phrases that they think are ';cool';.
They want to express how much they adore the Jonas Brothers by replacing words in popular phrases with something related to them.
For example, people say Oh My God alot (which is a sin, to my religion anyway) so they replace the word God with Jonas.
It's dumb. Like saying you have Obsessive Jonas Disorder. Some people could be offended by that.
My little brother has a mild form of OCD.
But I don't take it to seriously. I'd rather just live my life, and not care about what fans are obsessing over.Is it true Jonas fans are denouncing God when they use the term OMJ?
Hello to Christians Oh My God is misusing gods name. As in using it as a bad way. Like for us What The Hell is bad. So I say either Oh My Gosh or What The Hey. So now with Oh My Jonas I can show I'm a Jonas fan and not say anything wrong. Peace Love Jonas is nothing. Get over it. You don't really care. Some Christians think the word Suck is bad. But I am a Christian btw.
not at all.
dont take it seriously.
you've thought about it a little to much havnt you?
christan people dont say ohmygod anyway.
cuz thats kind of defacing or something.
i say ohmygosh.
anyway...
answer mine?
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind鈥?/a>
well the x in xmas stands for christ. or at least chi. or something.
but I think OMJ is really stupid but my mom said I shouldn't say oh my god because it devalues the name God and we're supposed to say oh my gosh instead.
I never say Oh My God, because it is misusing God's name.
I say Oh My Gosh.
So if people want to replace Gosh with Jonas, that's fine.
You shouldn't say that anyways.
no,because saying Ohhmygod is bad anyways because its saying his name in vain so actualy it better
It's showing that the Jonas Brothers are a cult. Sad generation.
that's just overly religious people with a stick up their a$$ that are complaining about that
wow youre so annoying....
dont take it seriously!
not at all you jonas hater
True or False? The term for the Palestinian uprising against Jewish settlement in the ancient lands of ?
the Bible is “Intifadah”.True or False? The term for the Palestinian uprising against Jewish settlement in the ancient lands of ?
.. more towards jihad-ism for the moslems....
.. more towards jihad-ism for the moslems....
What is more powerful in terms of love, First Love or True Love??
true loveWhat is more powerful in terms of love, First Love or True Love??
my first love is my true love too bad she's married and doesn't even know I existWhat is more powerful in terms of love, First Love or True Love??
First Love, its so much more intense when your younger!
First love is always special, its the best feeling since its your first time and you'll never know what to expect. Its always one of your best experiences in your life. It also can be one of the most painful.
True love is when you're a little more aware of what love is. re-living your life as it should be, could be better than the last one. But you still might expect a few new things, so it might be better.
But the first love is always a little special, even if true love prevails in terms of being ';powerful.';
Its special enough to change a person. ;3
They are both powerful but different intensity when you feel it.
true love..if your first love is your true love then your made in the shade man
true love coz it will make you whole
my first love is my true love too bad she's married and doesn't even know I existWhat is more powerful in terms of love, First Love or True Love??
First Love, its so much more intense when your younger!
First love is always special, its the best feeling since its your first time and you'll never know what to expect. Its always one of your best experiences in your life. It also can be one of the most painful.
True love is when you're a little more aware of what love is. re-living your life as it should be, could be better than the last one. But you still might expect a few new things, so it might be better.
But the first love is always a little special, even if true love prevails in terms of being ';powerful.';
Its special enough to change a person. ;3
They are both powerful but different intensity when you feel it.
true love..if your first love is your true love then your made in the shade man
true love coz it will make you whole
3 phase system in house is more cheaper than single phase system in terms of current consumption. is it true?
how does tht work...3 phase system in house is more cheaper than single phase system in terms of current consumption. is it true?
Yep, it would be more efficient than single phase. But not practical for home purposes.
Nikola Tesla invented our AC polyphase electrical system, as well as motors that make use of it. His motors don't actually run directly on ';current'; or even ';voltage'; in the sense that DC motors do --- they merely chase oscillating currents in the AC system. It's really much cleaner and more efficient . You probably have these Tesla ';inductive'; motors around the house -- in your washing machine, dryer, swamp cooler. They last a long time. Since they're small motors with low output requirements, single-phase is usually sufficient. Big industrial motors can make use of an added phase of oscillation, so industrial areas are usually wired to handle the extra power line.
A really great intro to how the grid is wired to your house, as well as a ton of fun electricity stuff can be found at:
http://amasci.com/ele-edu.html
Great article in there about why various plugs (polarized, grounded, etc.) have been designed. Great site for kids, too...3 phase system in house is more cheaper than single phase system in terms of current consumption. is it true?
3 phase is only for industrial equipment. It would be very expensive to run 3 phase into your house. Most household appliances run off of single.
Nope. Everything you have is made for single phase. (really dual phase, but everybody calls it single just to confuse things) You can use two of the three phases to run your stuff, but the voltages will be off, and you won't have a neutral so you could electrocute yourself. Since you had to ask this question, it's a pretty good bet you shouldn't be fooling with stuff that can kill you.
if your running industrial motors, but it is expensive to have three phase run into your house and regular appliances would only run on one of the phases any how.
Power consumption would be about the same.It would only be cheaper if electricity charges is cheaper for 3 phase system.
Yep, it would be more efficient than single phase. But not practical for home purposes.
Nikola Tesla invented our AC polyphase electrical system, as well as motors that make use of it. His motors don't actually run directly on ';current'; or even ';voltage'; in the sense that DC motors do --- they merely chase oscillating currents in the AC system. It's really much cleaner and more efficient . You probably have these Tesla ';inductive'; motors around the house -- in your washing machine, dryer, swamp cooler. They last a long time. Since they're small motors with low output requirements, single-phase is usually sufficient. Big industrial motors can make use of an added phase of oscillation, so industrial areas are usually wired to handle the extra power line.
A really great intro to how the grid is wired to your house, as well as a ton of fun electricity stuff can be found at:
http://amasci.com/ele-edu.html
Great article in there about why various plugs (polarized, grounded, etc.) have been designed. Great site for kids, too...3 phase system in house is more cheaper than single phase system in terms of current consumption. is it true?
3 phase is only for industrial equipment. It would be very expensive to run 3 phase into your house. Most household appliances run off of single.
Nope. Everything you have is made for single phase. (really dual phase, but everybody calls it single just to confuse things) You can use two of the three phases to run your stuff, but the voltages will be off, and you won't have a neutral so you could electrocute yourself. Since you had to ask this question, it's a pretty good bet you shouldn't be fooling with stuff that can kill you.
if your running industrial motors, but it is expensive to have three phase run into your house and regular appliances would only run on one of the phases any how.
Power consumption would be about the same.It would only be cheaper if electricity charges is cheaper for 3 phase system.
Is it true that Pro Active is really bad for your skin if used long term?
Ive heard that if you use Pro Active for too long it makes your skin worse than it was to begin with.... Also that it bleeches your towels, pillows and sheets? Anyone know why?Is it true that Pro Active is really bad for your skin if used long term?
Different acne treatments work differently for different people ;-) but I have compiled some info on Proactiv for you, based on reported experience:
Proactiv Negatives
===================
- irritating
- dry out skin
- expensive to keep having it sent to you month after month
- clear face up, but as soon as you stop using it the acne might come back
- it bleaches the cloth...
- doesn't seem to work as well on blackheads
- skin became darker
- temporarily red in areas
- slight burning sensation when applying toner/repairing lotion
Proactiv Positives
===================
- really does work
- clears your face up pretty quickly
- leaves your face feeling soft
- reduce the appearance of poresIs it true that Pro Active is really bad for your skin if used long term?
the chemicals in proactive are what bleaches your towels, pillows, and sheets.....but it is true that if you use proactive for a long time it does stop working and you don't see results anymore
It contains only 3% Benzyl peroxide....it's not really THAT strong. it's safe to use, unless you have crazy sensitive skin. THat also CAN cause bleeching of towels, but that never happened to me!
Yeah! It is benzoyle peroxide. Peroxide bleaches a lot of hair lighteners use peroxide to lighten hair.
yah i think so. well it was bad for my skin.
Different acne treatments work differently for different people ;-) but I have compiled some info on Proactiv for you, based on reported experience:
Proactiv Negatives
===================
- irritating
- dry out skin
- expensive to keep having it sent to you month after month
- clear face up, but as soon as you stop using it the acne might come back
- it bleaches the cloth...
- doesn't seem to work as well on blackheads
- skin became darker
- temporarily red in areas
- slight burning sensation when applying toner/repairing lotion
Proactiv Positives
===================
- really does work
- clears your face up pretty quickly
- leaves your face feeling soft
- reduce the appearance of poresIs it true that Pro Active is really bad for your skin if used long term?
the chemicals in proactive are what bleaches your towels, pillows, and sheets.....but it is true that if you use proactive for a long time it does stop working and you don't see results anymore
It contains only 3% Benzyl peroxide....it's not really THAT strong. it's safe to use, unless you have crazy sensitive skin. THat also CAN cause bleeching of towels, but that never happened to me!
Yeah! It is benzoyle peroxide. Peroxide bleaches a lot of hair lighteners use peroxide to lighten hair.
yah i think so. well it was bad for my skin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)